When you’re tired of the expense and upkeep of an unused pool, the idea of getting rid of it for good can be incredibly appealing. You envision a lush, green lawn where the money pit used to be. You research how to get rid of a pool, find a contractor for the pool demolition, and focus on the immediate goal: filling that hole. However, the decision to permanently remove a pool has long-term consequences that extend far beyond the initial backfill.
Many homeowners who opt for what seems like the simplest solution—a partial fill-in—are unknowingly trading one set of problems for another. While researching how much does it cost to fill in a pool, many people focus only on the immediate savings without realizing that these hidden risks can surface months or even years later, leading to costly repairs, landscaping nightmares, and significant complications when it comes time to sell your home. Before you commit to this irreversible path, it’s essential to understand the potential liabilities you might be burying in your own backyard.
The single most common issue with a filled-in pool is soil settling, also known as subsidence. When a contractor performs a partial demolition, they often use the broken concrete from the pool's upper walls as the bottom layer of fill. This is then covered with thousands of pounds of dirt.
This mixture of large rubble and soil is filled with voids and air pockets. Over time, rainfall and irrigation cause the finer soil particles to wash down into these gaps. As the soil compacts under its own immense weight, the ground level begins to sink. This doesn't happen uniformly. You'll notice dips, depressions, and an uneven, lumpy surface appearing across the former pool area.
This creates a constant landscaping headache. You'll find yourself repeatedly buying more dirt to fill the low spots and struggling to maintain a level lawn. It also creates a new, less obvious safety hazard: a lumpy, uneven yard that can be a tripping risk.
An in-ground swimming pool is a massive, watertight concrete basin. When you perform a partial fill-in, you are essentially leaving a giant buried bowl in your yard. While demolition crews are supposed to punch "sufficient" drainage holes in the bottom, these are often inadequate for the sheer volume of water a monsoon storm can dump.
The less-compacted fill dirt inside the old pool shell can absorb water differently than the dense, native soil surrounding it. This can cause the old pool area to become a subterranean basin, trapping water and creating a boggy, perpetually damp patch in your yard. This "bathtub effect" can lead to:
After reclaiming your yard space, you might dream of adding a casita, an outdoor kitchen, or a workshop in the future. However, if you chose a partial pool demolition, you've likely sterilized that entire section of your property for any future construction.
| Feature | Partial Fill-In | Full Removal | Freedom Deck Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Can you build a structure on it? |
No | Yes (with proper engineering) | N/A (provides a usable structure itself) |
| Can you plant large trees? |
No (roots can't penetrate buried shell) | Yes | N/A |
| Is the ground stable? |
No (prone to settling) | Yes (if properly compacted) | N/A (pool shell provides stability) |
| Is it reversible? |
No | No | Yes |
Most municipal building codes strictly prohibit the construction of any permanent, occupied structure on top of a non-engineered fill site, which is exactly what a partially demolished pool becomes. You have effectively created a large "no-build zone" in your yard, permanently limiting your property's future potential.
This is perhaps the most significant financial risk. When you sell your home, you are legally required to disclose the presence of a decommissioned and buried pool. For potential buyers and their real estate agents, this is a major red flag.
A savvy buyer knows a filled-in pool can mean potential problems with drainage and settling. They will likely:
The money you thought you saved on the initial pool demolition cost can evaporate in an instant during real estate negotiations. To understand the full financial impact, see our detailed breakdown here: Pool Removal Cost: A Full Breakdown vs. Smarter Alternatives
The final risk is the most absolute: permanence. Once you have completed the pool demolition process, there is no going back. Restoring a pool that has been filled in is not a matter of simply digging out the dirt. It requires a complete reconstruction, costing even more than building a brand new pool from scratch.
You have made a permanent decision based on your needs today, without considering that a future buyer might desperately want a pool. In a hot climate like Arizona, removing a pool can be a significant detriment to your home's marketability. You've closed a door that can never be easily reopened.
Each of these five risks stems from one fundamental action: the destructive, permanent alteration of your property. A Freedom Deck conversion was engineered to be the antidote to this very problem. It allows you to solve the immediate issues of an unused pool without incurring any of these long-term liabilities.
Don't trade one problem for five more. Before you decide how to get rid of a pool, look beyond the immediate fix and choose the only solution that protects your property, your investment, and your peace of mind for the long haul.
While using engineered fill and proper compaction techniques during a full removal can create a stable surface, it's much harder to guarantee with a partial fill-in. The presence of large, irregular concrete chunks makes uniform compaction nearly impossible, meaning the risk of settling is always present.
Sellers are typically required to disclose this on the property disclosure statement. Additionally, a savvy home inspector may look for signs like unusual grading, localized drainage issues, or circular or rectangular patches of newer landscaping that don't match the rest of the yard.
From a land-stability perspective, yes. A full inground pool removal is generally safer, but homeowners should also consider the long-term cost to remove an inground pool, since a full removal is significantly more expensive and just as irreversible.