When a seller says, “Let’s fill the pool in before we list,” they’re usually trying to remove uncertainty. They’ve heard stories about leaks, upkeep, safety worries, or buyers asking for huge credits. So they reach for the most final-sounding solution.
But permanent changes can create new problems:
That’s why the smartest approach isn’t “pool vs. no pool.” It’s presenting alternatives to filling in an inground pool that preserve optionality while still solving the buyer’s core fear: “This is going to become my problem.”
In most markets, buyers split into groups:
Pool avoiders immediately start thinking in searches like:
Your goal as the agent is to turn “unknown outcome” into “clear menu of options.”
Before you recommend anything, walk the seller through these four questions:
If the seller wants the home to appeal to both pool lovers and pool avoiders, permanent removal may not be the best first move.
A solution that takes days or weeks matters when you’re trying to hit a specific season.
A lot of owners don’t want to “erase” the pool forever. They just want to stop paying for it and stop worrying about it.
This is where solutions like a pool to deck conversion can change the entire conversation.
Below is the “menu” you can explain without sounding like a contractor.
Best when the pool is structurally sound and your comps show pool demand.
Use this language:
Buyers with kids often search pool cover safety before they even make an offer.
This option can help when the pool works, but buyers want risk reduced. Just be careful not to overpromise: many cover types reduce risk but don’t remove the emotional reaction some buyers have to open water.
This is the path sellers mean when they say “fill it in.” Buyers think of:
It can work for the right property—but it’s not the only path that solves buyer objections.
This is where covering pool with deck becomes a seller-friendly story:
In listing terms, this reframes the pool from “liability” to “outdoor living.”
When sellers ask what you recommend, stay in “advisor mode”:
This helps sellers feel supported without feeling pushed.
You’ll get asked, “What will this cost?” a hundred times. The safest, most effective answer is a framework, not a figure.
Here’s how to explain it:
A strong line to keep it clean:
| Path | Best for | Buyer perception | Timeline | Permanence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keep/ Refresh the pool | Pool-friendly markets | “Lifestyle feature” | Medium | Reversible |
| Cover safety solution | Safety-first buyers | “Safer, but still a pool” | Short – Medium | Usually reversible |
| Fill-in/ Removal | Sellers who want finality | “No pool, less worry” | Medium – Long | Permanent |
| Pool to deck conversion | Pool- avoiders + flexibility | “Outdoor living space” | Short | Often reversible via removable deck over pool |
If your seller permanently deletes the pool, you’ve locked in one buyer profile: “no pool.” That can be great—unless your best buyers in that neighborhood still want a pool.
With a conversion approach, you can market two lifestyles:
That’s a powerful differentiator when inventory is tight and attention spans are short.
If you want a client-friendly free guide of this topic, 20 FAQs About Freedom Decks: The Flexible Alternative to Pool Fill-Ins is a great handout.
If you remember only three things, make them these:
Say you’ll compare alternatives to filling in an inground pool based on timeline, buyer pool, and resale flexibility—then recommend the option that fits their listing goals.
Frame it as “outdoor living space now” and “future options preserved.” Keep it neutral: it’s one option on a menu, not the only answer.
Avoid guessing. Explain what drives cost (scope, access, timeline, finish) and encourage quotes—then compare disruption and permanence, not just price.